I believed that in the first few years of Shasta's life Arsheesh never was cruel to him but after Shasta became the age where he could do work for him, Arsheesh revealed his true colors, becoming more demanding and cruel. Like it said in the book he even went as far to box Shasta's ears. 

Huh still only one post here.

@nicemice2023 it's a topic that needs thought, not just reading the book!

I think he's a very ordinary working man of Calormen, with morals based on what he can get for himself and get away with. He is outwardly subservient to the ruling Tarkhans, but would like to be rich himself. 

As Bree's former owner states, any expense and effort in caring for the foundling baby was repaid in all the work the child did for him.  

The morals and attitudes that Shasta displays reflect how he was brought up: he does what he must and gets away with what he can. But at least Shasta knows he ought to love his father, and he knows stealing is wrong. 

What else about Shasta shows us aspects of Arsheesh?

Perhaps, Shasta's initial hope that in wealthier surroundings, being sold for a slave might be actually an improvement in his humdrum existence with Arsheesh, where everything, whether labour or food, has its price?

Yes, Arsheesh did rescue Shasta when he needn't have done so. But it is also a truism that skin tones largely depend on how one's skin processes available sunshine in different parts of the world. In hot Calormen, where fair skin is seen as a novelty, Arsheesh would see it worth his while to make the best use of an opportunity, where novelty could bring a better price.  

Now, Bree's description of Anradin, his owner, would certainly put Shasta wise. The bargaining between Arsheesh and Anradin was certainly interesting, when both men were what could be called "wheeler dealers". 

Interesting thoughts! Glad to see the topic getting more attention, I was worried maybe it was a bit of a pointless discussion I’d created.

I suspect the point of Narnia, even for its native inhabitants, is to make readers think, & to reassess their values. Who better to drive such a discussion than a character like Arsheesh, who knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing? Do you really think that Arsheesh would have rescued Shasta, if he had been any other sort of Calomene waif? At the very least, in the rescue Arsheesh describes to Anradin, he could hope for a handsome reward, when the circumstances of Shasta being found in a boat with a dead knight, suggests that the baby might have been actually someone of value to someone. 

But when no such wealthy claimant turned up, after how many years, Arsheesh might feel well justified into putting this child to any use that he could find, in his daily chores. But then, Anradin turns up....  What do you make of the situation?

Posted by: @nicemice2023

Glad to see the topic getting more attention, I was worried maybe it was a bit of a pointless discussion I’d created.

I'd like to encourage you not to stress too much about stuff like that. Some of your topics are going to get a lot of replies. Others won't. That's just the nature of the beast. Just keeping starting the ones that you think are interesting. 

Personally, I don't have anything to say about this topic because, well, I consider Arsheesh a generic, throwaway villain, not a character with a lot of depth. But there are probably a number of fans who do find him an intriguing figure. If those fans haven't contributed to this thread yet, that's probably just because they're not here on Narniaweb. That's their fault, not yours. I'm sure they're out there and if they ever read this topic, they'll appreciate you starting it.

FWIW, I believe the reason Arsheesh didn't leave Shasta to die was because he could use the free labor, not because of any particular scraps of decency. 

@Col Klink: well, I consider Arsheesh a generic, throwaway villain, not a character with a lot of depth.

Yes, Arsheesh is a minor character, but so is Anradin, the bloke who offers to buy Shasta. But when reading the news one gets plenty of real-life examples of where Arsheesh might be coming from. Whilst I agree that Arsheesh was only after the labour, there isn't much labour even a small pre-school child can deliver without being taught first. Arsheesh might be poor and illiterate, himself, but he knows money when he sees it, and does his best to acquire more of it. What about his leisure activities with his cronies, with Shasta serving them all? Is that how word got out to Anradin, about this mysterious fair-skinned boy? 

Hi everyone,

I think Arsheesh is an interesting addition to the Chronicles.  He is mean, selfish and cruel to Shasta but he does save the baby in the boat and bring him up - bearing in mind it will take a few years before the baby becomes a useful worker for the fisherman.  We also know that Arsheesh was deprived of sleep on the night he found the boat and that Aslan pushed the boat ashore to where a man waited wakeful to find it.  Therefore Aslan had a premeditated use for the fisherman, who was unaware of the Lion's impact on his life.  I had never considered before that Anradin may have heard of the fair-haired boy living with the fisherman, I had always thought he just needed a bed for the night, but it seems unlikely that a career Calormene warrior would be so far out of his way, doesn't it?  

Of course, the point of all the Chronicles is that whilst Aslan is Lord of Narnia, he leaves it up to Shasta and the other characters to make their own way, albeit with input from Aslan.  Shasta could have decided to stay with the fisherman for the rest of his unhappy life but had the courage to run away - same with Aravis.  I like her immensely!!