It was a nice movie and for some reason most of the changes didn't matter (perhaps because there were so many of them?). But there was one thing I just didn't get and still don't, even after five days (the movie came out here on the 11th) and a bit of research:
A couple of other comments:
Smaug: What a dragon! I liked the part with gold (the one others have mentioned too), it was like a cat who got wet and tried to get rid of the water .
All in all, I liked it. It is not the best movie ever done (and certainly not the same story as in the book), but I could go watch it again, even just for that dragon.
My art blog (both in Finnish and in English) http://mehinen.wordpress.com/
Things I liked:
Things I didn't like
"Tollers, there is too little of what we really like in stories. I am afraid we shall have to try and write some ourselves." - C.S. Lewis
Here's a long-ish look at what I did and didn't like about the movie and why:
Liked: The Prologue (which was a scene I'd expected in the first film)
Bilbo and Smaug
Small details both from the book and from the world that made the whole thing feel more real and in-line with LotR
Mirkwood
Beorn
Balin
Bard
The Dol Guldur subplot and pretty much all of Gandalf's scenes
And, sare I say it,
Things I did NOT like:
Barrels out of bond was too comical, despite the unnecessary addition of orcs and elves fighting the whole way
Beorn, like the rest of the opening, was there far too briefly, and his introduction to the audience and the dwarves' to him was just ... wrong
Laketown in general felt like it was dragging out a plot in ways that made no sense, from the smuggling into town to the orcs invading to the Legolas/Bolg fight. And Stephen Fry's Master did absolutely nothing for me or the character.
The whole action sequence in Erebor that interrupted an otherwise perfect Bilbo/Smaug exchange
To address some of the points others have raised:
Yeah, the orcs being in league with Sauron felt like too much with Smaug's hints about Sauron's return (which I thought were wonderful and fit in well otherwise)
The athelas being known to the dwarves didn't bother me. What bothered me was that Bard, a son of kings, didn't know its value. That seemed entirely out of character and was obviously thrown in for a laugh an another nod to FotR (of which there were far too many in this film).
I didn't mind Smaug the Golden, but I wish they'd have skipped that whole sequence in favor of more stuff from the book, particularly on the front end of the film, which as I have said felt overly rushed.
To explain a little better why I liked the Kili/Tauriel romance, which seems to be universally disparaged among my friends and fellow posters: the scene in the jail (minus Legolas' skulking) was very good character development for the film and offered a few slow moments after that incredibly quick-paced opening. Also, the idea of a dwarf/elf romance isn't too far off from a human/elf romance, which is well-established in Tolkien. The glowing effects might have been overdone, but I thought that her saving Kili and his reaction to seeing her as a powerful elf lady were well done. Also, her intervention/glowing and the athelas both made sense given that the orcs said it was an arrow from Minas Morgul that struck Kili. Elf medicine would have been necessary to save him. The biggest drawback to this plotline was Legolas' jealousy/not-quite-admitted romantic feeling for Tauriel. I wish they'd left it out and let the other two be.
A couple of closing thoughts: Thranduil's behavior seems a bit odd overall, and I'm not sure how much of it is the writing and how much the actor. I had a difficult time enjoying his scenes as much as I wanted, though he's not nearly as big a problem as some of the things above.
The white spider-creature that Bilbo kills: I appreciate what this scene was trying for, which is demonstrating the changes the Ring is already making in Bilbo's heart and the need for it he already has. However, I think this scene would have worked better had the creature been more obviously something like the baby spider it first appeared to be before it emerged. This would have emphasized the vulnerability of the thing Bilbo was attacking and the darkness that is starting to take hold in him.
Overall, I think the film's trouble was spending too much time on things that did not matter or added nothing to the story (i.e. skulduggery in Laketown, overlong Barrels scene, Erebor action sequence) and not enough on what did matter (Mirkwood, developing the dwarves (who after two films still look alike to me for the most part), more of Dol Guldur).
I'll go see the last film to see how PJ wraps it all up, but I'll be waiting to buy these films until they are on some kind of supersale in a few years, as I'd much rather rewatch LotR, Filmamir and all.
"All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies. And when they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you..."
Inexhaustible Inspiration
6689 posts from forum 1.0
Spoiler Free impressions of the movie:
Hmmm
Yup
Creeeeeepyyy
Peter Jackson showed entirely too much of his horror movie background in some scenes
The lights in the last part of the movie were harsh enough in 3D that I had to take the glasses off to handle it.
They spent a LOT of money on CGI
Definitely a middle
Now I wanna rewatch LotR.
I'm tempted to just quote Stwin's post and add "Ditto!", but we frown upon that sort of thing around here.
Things I liked:
Martin Freeman continues to be delightful as Bilbo. He's easily the best part of the movie and tied for my favorite movie hobbit with Sean Astin's Sam.
Smaug. Was. Amazing. I couldn't have asked for anything more in an enormous, evil, gold-hording dragon.
The visuals. PJ may have gone overboard with the CGI, but he's created some utterly gorgeous sets with it. Thranduil's halls and Erebor and Lake-town were simply amazing.
Thranduil: The book always left me with the impression that he was a greedy, selfish, paranoid jerk and that's exactly what the movie gave us with a dash of isolationism.
Tauriel: I expected the worst and was pleasantly surprised. Sorry, I even like Kili's fledgling romance with her, minus the awkward innuendo when he's first locked in the prison. The two of them actually got some character development, something every other dwarf minus Thorin and Balin has failed to achieve. Sorry, PJ, having Fili roguishly smuggle fifty billion knives in his coat is no substitute for giving him actual lines and a personality. Unfortunately, the side effect of casting someone who can actually emote as Tauriel just makes it that much more obvious that Legolas emotes about as much as a standard Keanu Reeves character in this movie. I don't remember Orlando Bloom being that bad in the LoTR movies, so I'm guessing he'll learn to feel and that'll be his character arc for the prequel.
Things I Disliked:
Mirkwood: They turned a terrifying, primeval forest filled with magic, darkness, and magical elven parties into a bunch of dwarves squabbling in light that barely qualifies as dim, much less actual darkness. There's no cursed rivers, nothing really interesting or scary whatsoever until the spiders attack. And then they cut out Bilbo being awesome and taunting the spiders for him getting distracted by the Ring and elven acrobatics. I get it, they want to make the dwarves look less incompetent than the book makes them seem, but short-changing (no pun intended) Bilbo constantly by lessening his Crowning Moments of Awesome is kind of tiresome.
The constant, never-ending, wearying action scenes: And each one has to have a gimmick. Oh, let's take the dwarves' weapons away and make them use one axe they got from an orc that they'll just throw from person to person. Oh, now we're fighting on rooftops. And don't even get me started on the Smaug fight at the end which did nothing to build Smaug up as a formidable opponent.
The Lake-town politics sub-plot:
Real life politics are rarely interesting. This political plot was no exception. The Master was neither villainous enough nor comical enough to make this plot bearable. I get that they wanted to build up Bard as a noble character, but this was just boring.
Honestly, this movie just screams filler. The parts that I wanted them to linger on are rushed, the parts I didn't care about go on and on forever, sort of like the road in Bilbo's song. I feel like they should have just stuck with two movies and stuck all the extra bits on the EE DVDs instead of forcing the material into a trilogy. I never thought I would say that, because I was initially very excited about the trilogy.
This is all very discouraging and I haven't even clicked on the spoiler boxes. I'll still see the movie but I'll just go in with low-expectations.
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11
Warrior, it's not a bad movie. I liked it as a movie. Most of my movie related quibbles are personal preference and technical. When the lights started flashing (not saying what lights), in 3D it was bright enough and my eyes were tired enough that it actually hurt a bit. It was easier to watch with the glasses off because the light was diffused.
Adaptation level is something I did not address in my spoiler free review. Fairly spoiler free spoiler below:
Thanks. I'll be seeing it in 2D (I don't understand the hoopla over 3D - I think it's tacky and a gimmick) but the movie isn't out until Boxing Day in Australia, which is the day following Christmas. So, I'll be looking for an enjoyable movie but not looking for a good adaptation? Got it!
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11
You're welcome. Pretty much. I went in with zero expectations on the adaptation level and was happy overall except for the fact it was most definitely a middle.
Tauriel:
Smaug:
The thing I missed the most:
Peter Jackson showing his horror movie background:
Kili:
The Lights:
I heartily agree with Booky on Beorn, Mirkwood, and the action scenes and Booky and stwin on Tauriel.
...On the other hand, reading kat's comments I'm sort of going
We have hands that fashion and heads that know,
But our hearts we lost - how long ago! -- G. K. Chesterton
Gore:
@Lady Galadriel, I would compare this movie to Prince Caspian.
Oh. That gives me a pretty good picture of what to expect. I was 0% happy/impressed with Prince Caspian the first time I saw it, and to this day I can still go on a rant about the things I wish they hadn't changed. Still, in my subsequent viewings, I've come to enjoy it as a fairly good movie in its own right. It's a good sequel to the movie adaptation of LWW, in my opinion, but a horrible adaptation of the book.
Thanks. I'll be seeing it in 2D (I don't understand the hoopla over 3D - I think it's tacky and a gimmick) but the movie isn't out until Boxing Day in Australia, which is the day following Christmas. So, I'll be looking for an enjoyable movie but not looking for a good adaptation? Got it!
Ditto on my end. I don't see much use of 3D other than to create a thrill. I saw AUJ in both 2D and 3D, and while 3D movies are always interesting to view (due to their contrast with 2D), it didn't leave a major impression on me.
What I am hearing from general public reviews is that it is a 'big improvement' on the first movie.
Tauriel:
SpoilerI actually didn't mind the addition of her character. As heavily action oriented as the movie is, her presence was a bit of a break. However, the light bit towards the last of her scenes was entirely overdone and a bit annoying. Saw an article online that she actually didn't want to be in a love triangle, but supposedly the studio heads said it needed to be in there. *rolls eyes* At least it was fairly minor compared to what it could have been.
Fascinating -- I saw a video interview with Evangeline Lilly in which
So, a bit of a random question, but in the last weeks before the movie first came out, I saw a large amount of speculation on TORN as to whether
Peter Jackson showing his horror movie background:
SpoilerThe gore level is high. The headless orcs and the violence level was a bit much. I honestly wouldn't want anyone under the age of 15 to watch this movie.
Would you say DOS is worse in some areas than the other Middle Earth movies, or is it pretty much on par? They've all got something in there that I cringe at no matter how many times I've seen it. One gory scene in AUJ which really bothered my mom in particular was when Azog holds up the head of Thorin's father.
Evangeline Lilly:
Meh.
That's really how I feel about the movie. Just meh.
Mirkwood was, dare I say it, utterly dull. The camera tricks were interesting to watch, but not as creepy as the book. Jackson does horror, Mirkwood should have been one of his finer moments!
The effect of the Ring is overdone. At this point in the story Sauron is supposed to be biding his time and getting ready to head to Mordor. He is not actively trying to use the Ring at this point. Same mistake they made with Faramir's reaction to the Ring in TT.
Dwarves use Athelas? I suppose, but it felt like too much of an obivous hey! This is that thing from LotR! Remember that? It's back. Isn't that cool?
Gandalf's fight moves in the Dol Goldur bit are from the LotR Lego game.
My brother counted. Tauriel has more lines than Bilbo. I wanted more Bilbo. Bilbo longing for his hobbit hole and a cup of tea. Bilbo fighting off all the spiders by himself and saving the Dwarves. More Bilbo sneaking around. More Bilbo burglaring. Just more Bilbo.
What was the point of Bolg? Having Azog fight Gandalf didn't really serve any apparent purpose.
I didn't like the romance. It felt too cliche. And too much like LotR had all these awesome love stories so Hobbit needs one so people will like it more and not complain about the lack of female characters.
Please don't ruin the Arkenstone plot. Please don't ruin the Arkenstone plot. Please don't ruin the Arkenstone plot.
Smaug was pretty awesome. Although his wings attached to his front legs took a bit getting used to.
I thought we were getting three movies because that way they could do more and better character development. I thought there was very little character development to speak of other than establishing as Bard as a reluctant hero archetype.
I honestly don't see how Prince Caspian was a horrible adaptation. There were some things changed, some that didn't need to be. But there were also some things that did need to be changed. I would say as a movie it was quite enjoyable and as an adaptation it was above average.
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11