Should Lewis have written The Magician’s Nephew earlier in the series or wouldn’t it matter that much? The Magician’s Nephew does contain the creation story of Narnia and sometimes I wonder why he wrote it second to last instead of at an earlier time for publication. He began The Lefay Fragment after writing The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, but apparently he wasn’t satisfied with it. I don’t know why he waited until the sixth book for The Magician’s Nephew to finally tell the creation story of Narnia, but maybe it was then that he knew exactly how to finish the book. But maybe it doesn’t matter that much in which chronological order the books were written. It seems more important that we have them. And maybe his readers asked him how Narnia came to be during the time when the first five books appeared in publication.
You could argue that people wouldn't have been invested enough in the world of Narnia early in the series to be interested in its creation. It needed the first five books to make it marketable.
For better or worse-for who knows what may unfold from a chrysalis?-hope was left behind.
-The God Beneath the Sea by Leon Garfield & Edward Blishen check out my new blog!
@col-klink absolutely. In fact, I think that's pretty much true of all prequels on a conceptual level - learning about the creation of a thing is usually only really interesting if you already understand the significance of that thing.
Yes, and the interest may have come later when people were curious about how Narnia came to be. I think that people may have mentioned that idea to Lewis long before he wrote The Magician’s Nephew, but after Narnia became well established.