INFJ: Lord help me not be a perfectionist. (did I spell that correctly?)

Nicely done! And as an ISTJ I usually say "Please God help me deal with inefficient supervisors handing down silly, and ultimately useless changes to processes that don't need em'".

Those personality type prayers are very funny, Arwenel!

INFJ: Lord help me not be a perfectionist. (did I spell that correctly?)

That is so true. The amount of times I'll read over a post to check for spelling errors.... Usually my INFJ prayers tend to oscillate between something along the lines of "Lord, help me be perfect!" and "Lord, help me stop expecting myself to be perfect!"

For Harry Potter fans, I thought this chart of personality types within the HP universe was interesting. It's been so long since I've read the books, though, I can't really say for sure whether the typing is accurate or not.

For Harry Potter fans, I thought this chart of personality types within the HP universe was interesting. It's been so long since I've read the books, though, I can't really say for sure whether the typing is accurate or not.

Some of them are pretty accurate. Others not at all. The problem is the picture tries to find a character to match each type. But the truth is, not every personality type is represented in the Harry Potter series, and some types are represented by multiple characters.

I think a more accurate typing of the characters would be as follows (the ones that differ from the picture are in italics):

Severus Snape: ISTJ
Neville Longbottom: ISFJ
Remus Lupin: INFP
Draco Malfoy: ESTP or ESTJ
Harry Potter: ISTP
Rubeus Hagrid: ESFP
Luna Lovegood: ISFP
Hermione Granger: INTJ or ENTJ
Ginny Weasley: ??? (I don't remember her well enough to type her)
Fred and George Weasley: ESFP
Ron Weasley: ENFP
Sirius Black: ESTP
Minerva McGonagall: ISTJ
Lily Evans-Potter: ??? (I didn't see enough of her to be able to tell)
Albus Dumbledore: ENFJ
James Potter: Possibly ENTJ, but it could also be ESTP. We don't get to know him too well.

~Riella

I got INTJ:

You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (78%)
You have strong preference of Intuition over Sensing (88%)
You have strong preference of Thinking over Feeling (88%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

Here is the hobbit version:

http://marissabaker.files.wordpress.com ... =640&h=800

I like the idea of being an elfish mastermind.

Also a Sherlock one:

http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ ... e91885.jpg

I have got mycroft in 2 of the 3 online Sherlock quizzes.

INFJ: Lord help me not be a perfectionist. (did I spell that correctly?)

Nicely done! And as an ISTJ I usually say "Please God help me deal with inefficient supervisors handing down silly, and ultimately useless changes to processes that don't need em'".

LOL! I have wonder why you remind so much of my older brother and now I know why!

I am definitely an ISFP. We for sure have ISFJ, ESFJ, INFP, ISTJ, INFJ, and ISFP at our house, the rest of the personalities are still developing.

SnowAngel

The issue I have with personality type question type quizzes is that they don't get into the why behind an answer, which is probably why I've tested as every single possible combination that includes the letter I.

For example, I hate making plans, but I am always planning something out. I have to. I have numerous medical conditions that necessitate as much planning as possible in order to have as little pain as possible. Since I have been actively planning so long, it is now second nature to me, even though I still don't really like it. Where is the line?

I got an ISTJ on this test, which is I think is the second time I've gotten this combination. I (67%) S (12%) T (62%) J (56%)

The first few sections were okay, but this one is wrong:

ISTJs tend to believe in laws and traditions, and expect the same from others. They're not comfortable with breaking laws or going against the rules. If they are able to see a good reason for stepping outside of the established mode of doing things, the ISTJ will support that effort. However, ISTJs more often tend to believe that things should be done according to procedures and plans. If an ISTJ has not developed their Intuitive side sufficiently, they may become overly obsessed with structure, and insist on doing everything "by the book".

Laws and traditions can sometimes be there for a reason, but if I don't know the why and how behind that tradition, what's the point? Breaking the law is bad, especially the NWeb forum rules. But I often find myself wanting to go against the set standard in traditions and societal expectations if there are no actual laws involved. A rule has to exist for a good reason before I would want to follow it rather than I would only break a rule for a good reason. Perhaps I don't have a narrow enough definition for "tradition"?

The ISTJ is not naturally in tune with their own feelings and the feelings of others. They may have difficulty picking up on emotional needs immediately, as they are presented. Being perfectionists themselves, they have a tendency to take other people's efforts for granted, like they take their own efforts for granted. They need to remember to pat people on the back once in a while.

On the contrary, I analyze everything, especially my own feelings! I am also often able to feel what others are feeling even if I don't want to. Sometimes I can turn the empathy off, and other times it hits me full throttle and I can't shake the effect. If you are really sad, I'll feel really sad, even if I don't know why you're feeling sad. As for being a perfectionist, well . . . maybe. Although, I think my days as a copy editor have more to do with seeing mistakes everywhere than anything else. I don't always care enough to make my sentences absolutely perfect if they're not being graded.

Looking over the long descriptions of the other personality types, I think I'm more a combination of an INTP (Thinker) and an ISTP (Mechanic), with the occasional urge to fulfill a duty (ISTJ) thrown in.

ISTPs are loyal to their causes and beliefs, and are firm believers that people should be treated with equity and fairness. Although they do not respect the rules of the "System", they follow their own rules and guidelines for behavior faithfully. They will not take part in something which violates their personal laws. ISTPs are extremely loyal and faithful to their "brothers".

This describes me a lot better. But I'm not great in a crisis situation and I'm definitely not an action-oriented person (which are other ISTP traits).

INTPs value knowledge above all else. Their minds are constantly working to generate new theories, or to prove or disprove existing theories. They approach problems and theories with enthusiasm and skepticism, ignoring existing rules and opinions and defining their own approach to the resolution. They seek patterns and logical explanations for anything that interests them.

Depends on the subject material, but this also nearly always applies to me. For instance, I love complex stories with plots and meta-plots and foreshadowing, and complicated timelines, but if one logical question can tear the entire premise apart I'm inclined to dislike the story and will only discuss it to pick apart all the reasons why it doesn't work. Most of INTP describes me pretty well, except for the "absent-minded professor" bit. I tend to be more grounded in reality than the definite INTP's that I know.

So, yeah. I think I'm an ISNTP.

The issue I have with personality type question type quizzes is that they don't get into the why behind an answer, which is probably why I've tested as every single possible combination that includes the letter I.

For example, I hate making plans, but I am always planning something out. I have to. I have numerous medical conditions that necessitate as much planning as possible in order to have as little pain as possible. Since I have been actively planning so long, it is now second nature to me, even though I still don't really like it. Where is the line?

Keep in mind, your personality type is an inherent part of you from birth. Outside circumstances (such as medical conditions, the way you were raised, personal experiences, etc.) do not determine or influence your type. Instead, your type influences how you react to outside circumstances.

With that in mind, think about the things you do. If you are forced to do something by someone or something, it is not your personality type that influenced you to do that thing; it has nothing to do with your personality type. In such a case, imagine if you were never forced. Imagine if it was completely up to you to choose. What would you choose to do? The answer to that question is the answer you should go with when trying to determine your type.

Laws and traditions can sometimes be there for a reason, but if I don't know the why and how behind that tradition, what's the point? Breaking the law is bad, especially the NWeb forum rules. But I often find myself wanting to go against the set standard in traditions and societal expectations if there are no actual laws involved. A rule has to exist for a good reason before I would want to follow it rather than I would only break a rule for a good reason. Perhaps I don't have a narrow enough definition for "tradition"?

In that case, I'd say you're definitely not an SJ. In general, SJs are famous for being change-hating rule sticklers who will fight tooth and nail against anyone who tries to change cultural/societal norms. You say a rule has to have a good reason for you to want to follow it. They'd say there would have to be a good reason to ever deviate from a rule.

On the contrary, I analyze everything, especially my own feelings!

Analyzing everything is the very staple of an N, so I would probably rule out being an S.

T's in general do tend to be cut off from their feelings and the feelings of others, but I've definitely seen exceptions to that - especially when dealing with NTPs. One of my close friends is an ENTP, and my best friend in highschool was an INTP. Both of them are extremely empathetic.

Most of INTP describes me pretty well, except for the "absent-minded professor" bit. I tend to be more grounded in reality than the definite INTP's that I know.

I'd definitely say INTP. No one matches the description of their type 100% because it's just a generalization. Although, when it comes to the "absent-minded professor" bit, most NTPs I know show that aspect by being chronic daydreamers. They are still very grounded in reality.

~Riella

I have found INTJ to be very close to who I actually am.

INTJ's tremendous value and need for systems and organization, combined with their natural insightfulness, makes them excellent scientists. An INTJ scientist gives a gift to society by putting their ideas into a useful form for others to follow. It is not easy for the INTJ to express their internal images, insights, and abstractions. The internal form of the INTJ's thoughts and concepts is highly individualized, and is not readily translatable into a form that others will understand. However, the INTJ is driven to translate their ideas into a plan or system that is usually readily explainable, rather than to do a direct translation of their thoughts. They usually don't see the value of a direct transaction, and will also have difficulty expressing their ideas, which are non-linear. However, their extreme respect of knowledge and intelligence will motivate them to explain themselves to another person who they feel is deserving of the effort.

This is very accurate of me. Many people don't understand my ideas until I explain them several times in different ways. I have also chosen to study a science based course at uni, so at least that adds up.

Other people may have a difficult time understanding an INTJ. They may see them as aloof and reserved. Indeed, the INTJ is not overly demonstrative of their affections, and is likely to not give as much praise or positive support as others may need or desire. That doesn't mean that he or she doesn't truly have affection or regard for others, they simply do not typically feel the need to express it. Others may falsely perceive the INTJ as being rigid and set in their ways. Nothing could be further from the truth, because the INTJ is committed to always finding the objective best strategy to implement their ideas. The INTJ is usually quite open to hearing an alternative way of doing something.

I find this to be very true. I am not set in my ways but people seem to think I am. They always say things like "you won't like this....because of this..." and I get very annoyed. I have found food/activities that people say I won't like very enjoyable.

I must say I am not one for expressing praise etc.. I want them to succeed but I just feel awkward doing such things. So the best You will get from me is that "you will be fine and good luck".

INTJs are natural leaders, although they usually choose to remain in the background until they see a real need to take over the lead. When they are in leadership roles, they are quite effective, because they are able to objectively see the reality of a situation, and are adaptable enough to change things which aren't working well. They are the supreme strategists - always scanning available ideas and concepts and weighing them against their current strategy, to plan for every conceivable contingency.

This is very like me when involved in group activities. Especially in school. I usually waited to see what others planned to do and only got involved if I thought there idea was not going to work or I had a much better one. I always finding myself taking control in such situations If no one else will(this is often and it can get very annoying).

so overall I am happy with the result and it explains why people have trouble understanding me and having to explain myself a lot. So please do not misjudge us INTJs.

@dotk I suppose one many of the traits tested you may be close to the 50% both ways which maybe why it is harder for you to relate to your type. I have very strong results for all the traits except for the Judging which was only a slight preference over perceiving. So I could relate to the personality type INTP nearly as much as INTJ.

Those "prayers" were pretty good! I have to admit that this one:

ISFJ: Lord, help me to be more laid back and help me to do it EXACTLY right.

...yeah, it's a bit too accurate.

Well, I also took the OCEAN test, and... the results were pretty much as I remember them.

Openness to Experience/Intellect
High scorers tend to be original, creative, curious, complex; Low scorers tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative.
You are somewhat conventional. (Your percentile: 20)

Well... not so much. I would consider myself conventional (in that I like to have rules to fall back on and work within), but far from down to earth. I guess that's why I got a "somewhat".

Conscientiousness
High scorers tend to be reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent.
You probably have a messy desk! (Your percentile: 17)

Yes, I do have a messy desk. The odd thing is, I love to come up with lists and rules for myself, I'm just very bad about following through. And I'm a stickler for things like formatting and spelling/grammar in my own writing. So yes, I can be disorganized and undependable, but I also like to organize and like to have things arranged a certain way. Go figure.

Extraversion
High scorers tend to be sociable, friendly, fun loving, talkative; Low scorers tend to be introverted, reserved, inhibited, quiet.
You tend to shy away from social situations. (Your percentile: 27)

No argument there.

Agreeableness
High scorers tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, courteous; Low scorers tend to be critical, rude, harsh, callous.
You find it easy to criticize others. (Your percentile: 17)

Well, that's a nice thing to say about low scorers. I admit, I am sometimes too critical, but I generally wouldn't dare be critical of someone I know personally (I'm much more likely to assign blame to "them", whoever "they" are).

Neuroticism
High scorers tend to be nervous, high-strung, insecure, worrying; Low scorers tend to be calm, relaxed, secure, hardy.
You are a generally anxious person and tend to worry about things. (Your percentile: 84)

Oh, no question.

I think the test fairly accurately describes me in some areas, though... given my scores, I'm not sure I want to admit to that.

Well, i took another version of the Myers-Briggs, and this time i got INFJ ... which except for the I is completely the opposite of what i got from the test in the original post. I retook it, and got ISTJ (i think?) which was even more unlikely than INFJ. I'm pretty sure now i'm an F as opposed to a T, albeit a logically-thinking inclined one.

I'd say i'm done trying to figure out which one i am, but most likely in a couple weeks/months i'll end up taking the test again, re-reading the descriptions, etc. in the hope that someday one will click.

@arwenel maybe you are in between a few of the types especially if you don't have a strong score for some of the traits.

I'm an INFJ, and my dad, sister, boyfriend, and two of my best friends are all INTJs, which I find particularly funny/interesting/weird/cool.

I know this thread isn't in the Narnia section, but it was stated that this thread is also for talking about fictional characters Myers-Briggs personality types, so I'm curious as to what you all think various Narnia characters would be?

Also, I found an interesting post on the Harry Potter houses and Myers-Briggs (for those of you interested in Harry Potter: http://aroomofrequirement.wordpress.com ... -typology/

I know this thread isn't in the Narnia section, but it was stated that this thread is also for talking about fictional characters Myers-Briggs personality types, so I'm curious as to what you all think various Narnia characters would be?

That's a good idea! I'm not a mod, but I'm pretty sure that would be on-topic here. I'd love to take a crack at typing the four Pevensies, although it's been a while since I've read the books they appear in and I feel like I need a refresher on all their personalities before attempting to type them. Need to start a reread of the whole series soon.

Also, I found an interesting post on the Harry Potter houses and Myers-Briggs (for those of you interested in Harry Potter: http://aroomofrequirement.wordpress.com ... -typology/

That's very intriguing! I'm an INFJ, too, and I think it's quite interesting that it says my primary house is Ravenclaw and secondary house is Hufflepuff. I pretty much always get Hufflepuff on house quizzes, but usually Ravenclaw will come in as a close second. That's a really clever way to look at the Sorting Hat's method of sorting—admittedly, it's always been a mystery to me.

(Btw, I saw this was your first post—welcome to the forum!! )

Also, I found an interesting post on the Harry Potter houses and Myers-Briggs (for those of you interested in Harry Potter: http://aroomofrequirement.wordpress.com ... -typology/

Hmm... I think that chart will be accurate in many cases, but inaccurate in many other cases. Personality type probably plays a big part in determining what house you're in, but there are many other factors as well.

It got me wrong. As an ENFJ, it says I belong in either Ravenclaw or Hufflepuff. But actually, I've always firmly belonged in Gryffindor. That blog post is very interesting; but when it comes to accuracy, nothing tops J.K. Rowling's own Sorting Hat Quiz on Pottermore.

Welcome to the the forum, by the way! We need more INFJs around here.

~Riella

Thanks for the warm welcome!

I'm definitely in Hufflepuff! All of my INTJ friends are either definitely in Ravenclaw or Slytherin as well. I thought what was most interesting about it is just the fact that they were looking at Houses rather than specific characters, with Myers-Briggs, which allowed for interesting insight.

I could use a bit of a refresher myself, but I think I'll take a stab at it anyway:

Lucy - ESFx
I could see her being either J or P, similarly, I'm a bit iffy about the E.
Susan - ENTJ
social (though as previously discussed, does not necessarily mean E
and I could easily see her being I), likes to have a plan, and I think it's
NT which causes her to stop believing in Narnia
Edmund - ENFx
He craves attention/recognition, which makes me lean towards E. Bit
iffy on N, definitely follows feelings/emotions, and again stumped on J/P
Peter - ISTP
On this one well... This one just felt right, but then again, Peter was
never my favorite character, so my impression of him might be a bit off.

In the spirit of the Silver Chair coming out soon (well, soonish....):
Jill - INFJ
N is the only one I'm really iffy about here
Eustace - INTJ?
A little iffy on this entire one, but it sort of works.
Puddleglum - xxxx
I'll be honest, I don't even know where to start with Puddleglum.

All of these are totally open to discussion and modification by the way. I was just putting out some rough ideas to start with