Really random question, but has anyone ever seen Finding Neverland? Is it clean? What's it about? Could you find a trailer?

Finding Neverland is a cute movie. It's based on the true story of J.M. Barrie, the author of Peter Pan, and how he got the inspiration for his stories. I haven't seen it for awhile, but I don't remember anything bad in it. Just the sort of content typical for a PG rated movie.

Here's the trailer:

~Riella

Oh, that looks so good! Thanks so much Ithilwen !

On a side note though, it's really weird to see Johnny Depp in a semi-normal role.

I watched a movie called The Wedding Singer with some friends a few nights ago. It was a romantic comedy about a guy who sings at weddings and the girl he eventually falls in love with. It was really funny. It was made in 1998 and set in the 80s so it has some awesome 80s music and some hilarious wardrobe and hair. It's rated PG-13 and there's a decent amount of crude humor and some language so if you're not ok with that, don't watch it.

narnian_at_heart,
oh boy, your use of "a movie called" makes me feel older than it should.
It sounds like you're younger than I am, by some years. I'm only 27, but that movie is fresh in my mind from its release, (on VHS). I was never a fan of it, except for some ok moments, (I believe this is the one where the older lady sings rapper's delight?, or whatever the song is called). I not a huge fan of Adam Sandler, mostly because of the crude humor, I only really enjoy two of his movies. 50 First Dates, it survives as one of the good ones, solely on Drew Barrymore's storyline, given that the rest can be thrown away and I wouldn't miss it. Big Daddy is the other I enjoy.

AslansChild ,
Concerning Finding Neverland,
It's a terrific movie! My favorite movie with Johnny Depp, hands down! Kate Winslet was terrific as well, in fact the whole cast was perfect. Aside of Depp, two other actors that appeared here also appeared in POTC. As for the content, it's not bad at all. I truly love this movie and would like to see your comments once you've seen it.

narnian_at_heart,
oh boy, your use of "a movie called" makes me feel older than it should.
It sounds like you're younger than I am, by some years. I'm only 27, but that movie is fresh in my mind from its release, (on VHS).

Don't feel too bad. I remember well when that movie came out on VHS as well (I'm 21).

But then, maybe 21 is considered ancient. I did even get to see Pocahontas in theaters, after all.

~Riella

Why are people obsessed simply with movies/TV shows being 'clean'? I'd be just as concerned about the worldview being portrayed. CCW = Content, Context, Worldview.

Why are people obsessed simply with movies/TV shows being 'clean'? I'd be just as concerned about the worldview being portrayed. CCW = Content, Context, Worldview.

Because some people have a sin nature that is sensitive to content, and they will start thinking unclean thoughts if they see it in movies. It's a trigger for some people. Other people are afraid of getting in trouble with their parents (if they're under age) or of being hassled over it (if they're over age, but still living with their parents). Other people are just really disgusted and turned off by it, and it stops them from enjoying the movie. CCW is important. But in some cases, content is just as important as well.

I started watching Miss Austen Regrets. I like it so far. I'm only a half hour into it, though. I'm going to watch the rest of it tomorrow.

~Riella

I realise that but it seems many people just care about their entertainment being 'clean'. I guess it has to do with the age of the person asking too.

narnian1 Thanks for your input, if I ever get to see it, I'll be sure to let you know.

Why are people obsessed simply with movies/TV shows being 'clean'? I'd be just as concerned about the worldview being portrayed. CCW = Content, Context, Worldview.

It's not that I'm simply obsessed with it being clean, there's quite a few movies that are clean that I simply don't enjoy. I'm aware of and take into consideration the message and ideals the film is portraying...but I want to live a life that is pure,clean, and acceptable to Jesus Christ, and I won't even consider watching a movie if it's inappropriate. First and foremost: Is it clean? Then I'll watch it and review the other aspects.

Ithilwen Miss Austen Regrets. I'm glad you like it. I had read two reviews on the film http://janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2 ... -my-taste/ & http://janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2 ... n-regrets/ ...and wasn't so sure how I would like it. It seems like Austen is very sad throughout the film, while I didn't get that impression at all from her writings. She seemed like a very witty, jolly lady. Any input you may have regarding that aspect of the film would be nice to hear.

I think what Warrior meant (and you can correct me if I'm wrong Warrior) is why are people ONLY taking into consideration if a movie is 'clean' before viewing it? Why not also consider other aspects along with whether it's 'clean' or not (like the ones he mentioned)? For example, if you look up a movie and find out it's 'clean' and then watch it anyways, you might stumble across themes that are really offensive. When I was little, my parents absolutely refused to let us watch Pocahontas because of all the nature worship in the movie, and it was completely clean. I think that's what he meant.

The other night, my husband and I saw the movie 'Red' starring Bruce Willis which I had never heard of before. It was actually quite hilarious because of how completely random and bizarre it was.

Apparently it's based off of a DC comic that I've also never heard of? Anyways, it was pretty hilarious seeing all of these classic actors like Helen Mirrim and Morgan Freeman go all crazy in a silly action flick that doesn't take itself seriously at all. It reminded me of another Bruce Willis film, The Whole Nine Yards.

Oh, and Warrior, you'll be happy to know that I just got The Adventures of Tintin in the mail today and I'll hopefully be able to watch it tonight. (If not it'll probably have to wait until after the Holiday weekend.) I've been looking forward to this one!

I think what Warrior meant (and you can correct me if I'm wrong Warrior) is why are people ONLY taking into consideration if a movie is 'clean' before viewing it? Why not also consider other aspects along with whether it's 'clean' or not (like the ones he mentioned)? For example, if you look up a movie and find out it's 'clean' and then watch it anyways, you might stumble across themes that are really offensive. When I was little, my parents absolutely refused to let us watch Pocahontas because of all the nature worship in the movie, and it was completely clean. I think that's what he meant.

I think it's because there's such a difference between how we're affected by the film's worldview and how we're affected by content. They'll definitely be on an equal level for children or people who don't have all their beliefs firmly in place yet. But it's different for those who already know what they believe. For example, if I spend time with people who believe in Evolution, reincarnation, Buddhism, etc., and they tell me their beliefs, that isn't going to have any negative effect on me or bother me (other than the fact that I might want to pray for them). I just politely disagree with them and go on. But if I spend time with someone who is constantly dropping heavy swear words and their conversation is chock full of suggestive innuendo whenever I talk to them... I suppose movies are the same way for me and a lot of others. Bad content in a movie will drive me up the wall if I have to see/listen to it. But something like a humanistic message will more likely just make me roll my eyes. Although, like you FK, the non-Godly spiritual ones (worshiping nature and the like) are also ones I sometimes avoid, simply because they creep me out.

Ithilwen Miss Austen Regrets. I'm glad you like it. I had read two reviews on the film http://janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2 ... -my-taste/ & http://janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2 ... n-regrets/ ...and wasn't so sure how I would like it. It seems like Austen is very sad throughout the film, while I didn't get that impression at all from her writings. She seemed like a very witty, jolly lady. Any input you may have regarding that aspect of the film would be nice to hear.

Thanks for the links. Hopefully I'll get to watch the rest of the movie tonight, and I'll let you know how I liked it. As for the accuracy, you'd probably have to compare the movie with her real life, as recorded in her biographies and personal letters. I have a collection of her letters which I hope to read someday soon.

Oh, and Warrior, you'll be happy to know that I just got The Adventures of Tintin in the mail today and I'll hopefully be able to watch it tonight. (If not it'll probably have to wait until after the Holiday weekend.) I've been looking forward to this one!

I saw Tintin recently as well. It wasn't as good as I had hoped it would be, and the beginning was especially slow. It was more action oriented than character oriented. Maybe that's what it's supposed to be, I don't know. But I've always preferred movies that are more character driven. However, I really liked Captain Haddock. I suppose you can't go wrong with a character that's played by Andy Serkis.

~Riella

I think what Warrior meant (and you can correct me if I'm wrong Warrior) is why are people ONLY taking into consideration if a movie is 'clean' before viewing it? Why not also consider other aspects along with whether it's 'clean' or not (like the ones he mentioned)? For example, if you look up a movie and find out it's 'clean' and then watch it anyways, you might stumble across themes that are really offensive.

I understand that, & I certainly agree. But I also agree with Ithilwen, in a sense.

I think it's because there's such a difference between how we're affected by the film's worldview and how we're affected by content. They'll definitely be on an equal level for children or people who don't have all their beliefs firmly in place yet. But it's different for those who already know what they believe.

There's kind of a difference with a movie that mentions a different worldview (in passing) because then we say: "Oh, we know that's wrong because of......" But with other things like heavy swearing and sexual content or innuendo, it's right there in your face. I'm not saying I'd watch a whole movie laced with a wrong worldview, but I'd be a lot more lenient watching Kung Fu Panda, then say...a James Bond film. Sorry, if my earlier post didn't explain that right.

Fantasia_Kitty, you're absolutely right about what I meant by my post. Also, I hope you enjoy the Tintin movie. As a life-long fan of Tintin, I had some issues with the movie but I really enjoyed it.

Ithilwen, while I understand your preference, Tintin has always been a more plot-driven series than a character-driven one. Personally, I too generally prefer character-driven stories but sometimes you have to enjoy things for what they do have, rather than what they don't have. Still, Tintin has some very interesting characters, it's just that Tintin isn't one of them!

Everyone: I believe it's important to take content into consideration when watching any type of entertainment but objectionable content is generally very obvious. Humanist or pagan worldviews and perspectives can be incredibly subtle though and in that sense a lot more dangerous. That's my point.

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close: I have not seen this movie but heard a lot of good reports about it. I'm looking forward to it.

Have you watched it yet?
I've been curious about that one, usually not a big fan of movies in that genre unless they are pretty good. But was thinking it might be, with Tom Hanks..

Me and my 5 month old daughter watched Starship Troopers the other morning while Mom was off at work. I figure that by showing her action packed movies at this age she'll be able to handle her first viewing of Commando by age 3, and then mission complete!

At any rate, Starship Troopers...egads, what a mess! Paul Verhoeven, who did Robocop (among others), took the very basic premise of the book...and I'm being quite generous here, and turned it into a sort of empty-headed action romp starring pretty people engaged in a war with the Bugs, a group of sentient spiderlike aliens that have it out for humankind and decide to declare war by destroying Buenos Aires. The book itself is extremely divisive, and Verhoeven took the view that it's fascist and modeled the movie after it (he admitted to not reading the whole thing, which shows ). So lots of people run around, some bugs blow up, some Mobile Infantry get chewed up (literally) and Denise Richards flashes her winning smile to the unhappy viewers.

What's really terrible (besides this being a fun, albeit completely unfaithful to the book disaster film) is that ST has two of my favorite supporting actors in all of the movies; Michael Ironside and Clancy Brown. They're both great in their respective roles, of course, but it's just not enough to make me want to get behind this movie. The film is loaded with gore and a few adult moments. I can't' see more than perhaps 2-3 other people on NWeb seeing this, but figured I'd toss it out. Word on the street is a reboot is being made at some point in the future which will be much more faithful to the book, which itself was a great piece of sci-fi reading.

If you're a red-blooded, meat eating action film afficianado, you'll probably want to give this one a view, although I can't predict if you'll like it or not. To the rest of you, don't bother with this one.