Discussion here is moving rather rapidly, and I think my post will get rather convoluted if I'm trying to reply to a quote in response to a quote in response to another quote. So I will make a few independent thoughts.
1) I think evolution has a very fundamental emotional bias against it from some Christians because it allows atheists to more easily have confidence in the worldview a universe created without God (life being one of the most difficult things to explain in purely natural terms). There's also a big reward to be had by knocking it down - without evolution, atheists are hosed.
I think evolutionists are at times a bit too overly dogmatic about the ability of evolution's evidence to explain certain aspects of life's history.
I think part of this is the creationist's tendency to use criticisms of evolution in lieu of evidence for creation.
2) The problem of evil has two forms: logical and evidential. The logical has to do with whether it is logically possible for an omnipotent, omnipresent, omnibenevolent God and evil to co-exist. The evidential has to do with whether it is probable that a God of all the mentioned traits would allow evil in such magnitude.
I don't think the logical problem is an issue for Christianity. If evil did not exist, we would have nothing by which to measure good, and goodness would have no meaning. We wouldn't know what beauty was without also seeing ugly things, etc. (Supreme oversimplification of the issue, but the concept agreed upon by a lot of philosophers and theologians.)
The evidential is more problematic. The German philosopher Leibniz coined a phrase that I think very eloquently frames the issue. The world we live in that God created has to be, in theory, the 'best of all possible worlds', because if there were any worlds that were better, an omnibenevolent God would have surely created those instead!
So the world we live in has to have the most amount of good for the least amount of evil created possible. That's a little hard to swallow, since this world has a lot of evil. Christians can have a back-door exit to this problem by saying that we aren't omniscient and so there may be so much good in the future that it would outweigh the bad in the past, or some similar line of thought. Up to the individual to discern whether that's personally convincing or not, I suppose.
3) The argument about social standing affecting one's worldview can be argued by either side.
Atheists can claim that Christians living a healthy, wealthy, comfortable lifestyle attribute their providence to God while ignoring the fact that income inequality means most of the world lives in poverty. If the Christians were to suddenly become poor, they would quickly renounce their faith! An example of this off the top of my head is in Elie Wiesel's 'Night', an autobiography from when he was a prisoner in the Nazi concentration camps. He felt abandoned by God and lost his faith during the abominable actions he and others were subject to.
Christians can claim that Atheists living a healthy, wealthy, comfortable lifestyle ignore God because they don't need any assistance in life. Take away their upper-middle class comforts, and they'd start praying fast! Take for example any of your 'atheist in foxhole' scenarios or the interesting fact that religion is far more prominent in the the developing world than it is in Europe's first world countries.
The argument may be emotionally convincing when presented with isolated evidence from one side, but I don't think it is logically convincing.
The question of whether God can be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent also requires a definition of "omnibenevolent". If omnibenevolence means that God cures every person who is sick and helps every person who is in need, then it is definitely a contradiction, since He clearly has not done that. But I don't believe the scriptures are referring to such a thing when they call God benevolent or compassionate. If God decided to be that definition of benevolent, it would be in conflict with his side of justice, as well as his allowance of free will.
What does it mean by benevolent, then? Well, the Bible also describes the depravity of the human race, and that we are evil to such an extent, that every human that has ever lived or ever will live (except Christ Himself) deserves to be destroyed/thrown into Hell. But God has not destroyed the human race; instead, he decides to save some from hell. The fact that he does allow evil? That is[i/] His benevolence. Because we are our own enemy. If He decided to destroy evil, He would destroy us. But He spares us - in effect, showing His benevolence and allowing evil to continue all at once.
~Riella
The German philosopher Leibniz coined a phrase that I think very eloquently frames the issue. The world we live in that God created has to be, in theory, the 'best of all possible worlds', because if there were any worlds that were better, an omnibenevolent God would have surely created those instead!
I wouldn't consider Leibniz's philosophy to be particularly solid in this respect. He seems to incorporate the world's evils as part of what must be 'the most perfect possible'. My suspicion is that he put forward this argument about God's nature/creation's nature for a more specific metaphysical or scientific purpose (he had a habit of doing this - he had a lot to say about the structure of space and time and rivalled Isaac Newton on this).
My view is that God did create a perfect creation. Without evil. Evil he did not create, but it was allowed to enter and to corrupt according to the will of mankind. Upon the death sentence of Jesus, however, what had been made corrupt can now be made perfect again, through him, acceptable to the Father.
Thus:
In its creation the world was literally perfect, and in its conclusion it is literally perfect. The intermission of evil (that is nullified anyway) merely reveals & glorifies the perfection of his grace - which astounds the hosts of heaven as much as it does its direct beneficiaries: us. It seems to outshine even the more comprehendible acts of creation and judgement, at least to me.
Welcome back, Minotaur! I'm greatly encouraged by your journey. You've mentioned some great stuff. There are some things to still work on though. Keep plugging away.
I don't have the eloquence of Minotaur, but one reason there's so much evil in the world is due to human pride and greed. Yes, Satan was kicked from Heaven, yes, Adam and Eve were tempted in the Garden. But most evil attributed to God, is nothing more than God saying - fine: you don't want to love each other, as I've loved you! And then he let's us see how much we need him. People are poor and rich because of the world's inequality of wealth. We are the problem, not God. And yet, people won't stop looking out for number one (themselves) until Christ brings an end to sin.
As for evolution, one reason why it doesn't reconcile with the Christian faith is that it's just a more modern version of the age-old pagan philosophies and religions where they tried to remove God from their world, so they weren't responsible to anyone and there were no consequences for their actions. They made God in their image by deifying kings and queens. These deified kings and queens resulted in the 'creation' of different deities (think Mesopotamian, Egyptian and Greek myths - all corrupted versions of God's Truth, found in the Bible). They could make these idols say and do whatever they wished, because they made them! Stories and histories of kings and queens were conflated with other important figures (warriors etc.) and exaggerated beyond belief. Ever wonder why Hercules echoes Samson? It's a myth based on his life. Now, we've 'advanced' to the point where we not-so-subtlety deify ourselves. Evolutionary theory is just another form of ancestor worship under the guise of Science.
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11
W4J, just because Secular Evolutionists try to use the theory for the sake of godlessness, how does that invalidate the theory itself? Some people try to use religion for evil purposes as well, but that doesn't validate religion itself. Why wouldn't the same principle apply in this case?
~Riella
Random question: What happens when you perform a curse on someone else? Will it come back to you? Is there a such thing as karma?
Just wondering.
--Moonlight
Forever a proud Belieber
Live life with the ultimate joy and freedom.
Moonlight, I seriously hope you're trolling because no good comes of getting messed up in the spirit world. You may feel like you're in control but the evil spirits will be the ones really in control. It's a deadly road to travel. Only Christ can help you there.
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11
I am going to leave the other conversations be because they seem to be just going around in circles. We will have to agree to disagree. Also There are about 5 other topics going on and it was getting a bit mixed.
Moonlight: You can't perform curses on people. You can act like you are but you can not truly curse someone. You will look like you are messing in the evil spirit world to most Christians and silly to the agnostics/atheists.
What happened was me and some friends performed a curse on someone else that his car would be totaled. The next week me and my friend both got into severe accidents that totaled our own cars. Needless to say I've learned my lesson and will never do curses again. Scary stuff.
Forever a proud Belieber
Live life with the ultimate joy and freedom.
W4J, just because Secular Evolutionists try to use the theory for the sake of godlessness, how does that invalidate the theory itself?
I don't think it does, but it doesn't mean that it's compatible with Christianity. If there was something...anything, in the Bible that could support Evolution I think it'd be much more accepted. But because the theory has no Biblical support (and I challenge anyone in this thread or anywhere else in the world to show me *contextual* verses that support it and point at it ) I cannot go with it. There are people who will call me a hick or a spiritual hayseed or a rube, and I'm fine with that. I think the Theory of Evolution is fascinating to read about, and I suppose from a scientific explanatory stance it probably makes a lot of sense, but for years people thought the Bubonic Plague came from stinky air, flies spontaneously erupted from spoiled meat, and the Earth was flat. I don't think it's required to believe in the Creation story to be a Christian, but because Genesis is the bedrock upon which the Bible was written I think that so too shall a Christian's foundation have a few wobbly spots if they discount the Genesis account too.
Kennel Keeper of Fenris Ulf
Well, Shadowlander got in before me. I agree with what he just said. I can't see how anyone can reconcile evolutionary theory and one's faith in God, because you really have to force that way of thinking into what the Bible says. I was taught evolution at my Christian primary school and high school (by the law it had to be taught). I learned about the theory from books and the like, mainly ones to do with dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures.
The biblical understanding made much more sense to me, even as a child. I've read quite a bit on both sides of the coin (books, articles, scientific magazines) and found the understandings evolutionary theory supposedly provides to be both boring and silly. There's absolutely no evidence for the changes in nature prescribed by such a belief. Christian evolutionists often seem to be rather antagonistic towards those of us who believe differently. It's disturbing. I also believe Genesis 1-11 are historical, not just truthful mythology. I think critically about such things, I don't just accept what I read but I do believe God's Word is the final authority and that the buck stops with Him.
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11
Just peeking into this thread, and had no intention of adding anything until Moonlight spoke up.
I cannot support what I say on any Biblical foundation, but I have spoken with a relative who has messed with witchcraft. Her first words would be GET OUT OF IT! FAST!
She warned of experiances of those who tried cursing Christians only for it to backfire, as you described, sometime fatally!
Even among the secular references I know of such things ALWAYS come with a cost. It may look like you have control, and have power, but you are not.
Puddleglum is right. God is more powerful than the Enemy. If someone curses a Christian, it will bounce back and hurt the one who performed the spell. But don't get involved with the occult. It's a dangerous world and not just physically. Your very soul is at stake!
Currently watching:
Doctor Who - Season 11
I've learned my lesson and will never do it again!! EVER!! I can't defend what I did because yes it was very wrong. It was my friends idea and I think he got carried away, but I was there going along with it instead of stopping it. Then it came back times two!
Do you believe God gives Christians premonitions/dreams? Or is such a thing from evil spirits?
Forever a proud Belieber
Live life with the ultimate joy and freedom.
To your question about dreams. Yes.
Joseph was told in a dream to marry Mary. He was also warned to flee Bethlehem before Herod sent his soldiers.
Paul was directed in a dream to go to a particular city.
There are a few others. But you must always be careful. Be sure to seek council, and be sure whatever you may believe is the message from the dream that it does not contradict scripture.