That's...interesting. Aren't those books really misogynistic? The third one anyway? I'm surprised they could find enough actors who weren't offended by it to do a full cast dramatization. (And I am not someone who is super sensitive about misogyny. After all, people accuse the Narnia books of misogyny, and I love those. I also love classic fairy tales which get accused of misogyny. In fact, considering how much people on the internet either complain about misogyny or misandry, probably most of what I love has had that charge leveled against it. But That Hideous Strength is too much even for me. )  

The BBC frequently releases radio dramatizations of classic literature with a disclaimer that the content may be offensive to some listeners. They have mostly been recorded at least 20 years ago so there may have been more actors willing to be involved with a project that would be difficult to cast now.

I am also pretty thick skinned about books that have been accused of being misogynistic but I have heard such mixed opinions about the Space Trilogy that even though I have owned an omnibus edition for years I've never read it. 

@col-klink works written in the 1930s and 1940s are likely to show a different attitude to women.  

The Space Trilogy does definitely have some rough bits, especially in book three, but to me at least it's interesting enough to be worth my time if I'm not expecting perfection out of it. And I'm honestly thrilled they're looking at doing an adaptation. It's deeply weird but full of wonder, and I have repeatedly attempted fanart for it. (I am on team "justice for Jane Studdock," but I'm glad her story *exists* even if I hate how it was handled. And neither of the other books bothered me as badly.)